 |
| NIEUW 05-05, vanaf heden is er de rubriek Flitspost in de linker kolom. De links hier leiden naar een nieuwe pagina waar korte artikels geplaatst worden |
 |
- De strijd tussen het weer en global warming
- Zonnevariaties verklaren groot deel van de opwarming
- Entropie, de tweede hoofdwet van de thermodynamica - 1
- Poolijs smelt niet sneller door temperatuur van de atmosfeer
- Afname zonnevlekken leidt tot meer orkanen
- Hoe kan er een broeikaseffect bestaan op de maan
- Het wereldprobleem van de onwetende Al Gore
- Klimatologen zonder zelfrelativering willen erkenning
- Windpatronen hebben grote invloed op poolijsomvang
- Broeikaseffect speelt geen rol in de 'faint early sun paradox'
- Hoe de overheid wetenschap corrupt heeft gemaakt
- De waarheid achter de voorbeeldige Duitse windenergie
- Zware milieuvervuiling voor uw fictieve groene energie
- Een uitleg van de radiative forcing
- Bewijs voor warmere interglacialen uit ijsboorkernen
- IJsomvang Noordpool nadert een nieuw jaarlijks maximum
- Professor Jaworowski, global warming is een leugen
- Opwarming is mogelijke indicatie voor een nieuwe ijstijd
- Een simpele uitleg van het broeikaseffect is niet zinvol
- Wanneer komt de ondergang van Global Warming
- Mathematische methode sluit blijvende Global Warming uit
- Phil Jones: geen significante opwarming sinds 1995 !
- De propaganda en activistische achtergrond van het IPCC
- Feedback CO2 uit koolstofkringloop veel lager dan aangenomen
- De vertaalslag van wetenschappelijk materiaal door het IPCC
- Warmte opname van de oceaan neemt sinds 2005 af
- Pachauri en zijn IPCC verstrengeld in Glaciergate
- Een simpel lesje over broeikasgassen voor beginners
- Video Global Warming the other side
- De falsifieerbaarheid van de Global Warming hypothese
- De Large Hadron Collider, zwarte gaten en de oerknal
- De wereld is weer gered want Kopenhagen was een fiasco
- Krijgen we een NASA-gate na CRU Climategate?
- Ian Plimer over CRU climategate en ons historisch klimaat
- Hadley CRU fabriceerde hockey stick voor Nieuw Zeeland
- Emails van klimaatonderzoekscentrum Hadley CRU gehacked
- Kunnen we vaker een Maunder minimum verwachten?
- Hi-tech klimaatonderzoek, CERN start CLOUD experiment
- Klimaatconferentie in Kopenhagen aanzet tot wereldregering?
- Groeitempo van bomen beïnvloed door kosmische straling
![Klik hier : Temperatuur versus [CO2]](http://www.klimaatfraude.info/images/temp_vs-co2.jpg)
- Evidence for 6-10 C warmer interglacials
- Koersverlegging in onderzoek naar aards broeikaseffect
- De staat van klimaatonderzoek 2009
- Waarom wankelt de AGW hypothese
- Klimaatveranderingen in het Holoceen
- Klimaat verkeert niet in een crisis
- Analyse van dreigende opwarming
- Kun je met modellen voorspellen?
- Staat van klimaatonderzoek 2008
- Staat van klimaatonderzoek
- Klimatologie en de flogistontheorie
- Groenlandse ijsmassa neemt nog elk jaar toe
- De oceaan als thermostaat
- CLOUD nadert opstartfase
- Cosmic Rays and Climate, Jasper Kirby
- Verklarende site, The Cloud Mystery
- Brief summary on cosmoclimatology
- Cosmic Rays and Earth's Climate
- Svensmark_2007 Cosmoclimatology
- CLOUD experiment
- CERN, Cosmic rays and climate movie
- CERN, Cosmic rays and climate sheets
- Cosmic meddling with the clouds
- Kosmische straling zorgt voor Ozon afname
- Correlation Cosmic Rays and Ozone Depletion
- Correlation Cosmic Rays and Ozone Depletion
- Galactic Cosmic Rays are Drivers of Climate
- CFC's, Cosmic Rays and Global Warming
Deel 2, Deel 3, Deel 4, Deel 5
- Don Easterbrook projections
- SC24 Where are the sunspots?
- Abdussamatov, The Sun Defines The Climate
- New Little Ice Age Instead of Global Warming
- The Past and Future of Climate
- Livingston & Penn, Sunspots vanish by 2015
- Next solar cycles spell danger
- While the sun sleeps
- Forecasting Solar Cycle 24 and beyond
- Abdussamatov, project Astrometria
- Deep freeze around 2055-2060
- Millennium-Scale Sunspot Reconstruction
- Predicting Solar Cycle 24 and beyond
- Climate Models and the Evidence
- Climate Change Driven by the Ocean
- How Governments Corrupt Science
- Climate Change and its Causes
- The Missing Hotspot
- Global Warming: A Lie Aimed At Destroying Civilization
- United States Senate Report on Climategate
- Why the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets are Not Collapsing
- Climate Money
- Holocene and recent temperatures from proxies
- Surface Temperature Records
- Spinning the Climate
- Climategate Analysis
- Environmen tal Effects of Increased CO2
- The Sun Still Rules Our Climate
- The Global Warming Scam
- CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal
- UN & IPCC Cancer of Global Warming
- Creation of the hockey stick
- Hockey stick is tweetraps fraude
Posted on: March 07, 2010
Hier volgt een samenvatting van de ervaringen en bevindingen van klimaatwetenschapper Zbigniew Jaworowski, lees het volledige relaas hier.
stuur dit doorFor many years, I analyzed the results of measurements of CO2 concentrations in ice cores. The whole global warming hysteria is based on this ice core work. In the last century, since the 1960s, I organized 10 trips to 17 different glaciers, collecting data on the impact of manmade emissions (mainly heavy metals from industry) on the environment.
I learned how this climate ideology functioned, when I worked at the Norwegian Polar Institute. After some time, the Ministry of Environment asked the Institute to examine the implications of global warming due to human activities. I began to investigate whether any warming had actually occurred in this part of the Arctic. After conducting research, I came to the conclusion that there is no reason to believe so, because the temperature measurements carried out in this part of the world for nearly 100 years showed no signs of warming.
The deeper I analyzed the problem, the more it convinced me that there is no man-made global warming, and CO2 does not noticeably cause the process of warming. My colleagues and I have shown that extrapolating the atmospheric measurements of CO2 from the gas measured in polar ice cores was an exaggeration of the results, and even manipulation. The ice itself is not a suitable material for assessing the chemical composition of the former ancient atmosphere. Several physical and chemical processes are going on in the ice. These lead to loss of CO2 from air bubbles trapped in ice.
All the cores themselves are cracked, and extremely contaminated with heavy metals from the drilling fluid which penetrates into their interior. For example, in the ice core from Vostok Station in Antarctica the concentration of lead is 6,800 times higher than in the surface snow and zinc from is 600,000 times higher. So, the whole hypothesis of humans heating up the climate is based on faulty material like this.
De analyses die gemaakt worden uit ijsboorkernen zijn dus hoogst onbetrouwbaar omdat er te veel veranderingen in de tijd plaats vinden, en bovendien wordt het materiaal gigantisch vervuild door de boorvloeistof. Zie hier hoe men historische data vervalst heeft door gemeten waarden zomaar 83 jaar vooruit te schuiven, en hier meer over het onderzoek van Jaworowski naar de problemem met de herleiding van CO2-concentratie uit ijs.
We wrote two reports on the subject. The scientific director of the Norwegian Polar Institute called me and said that our publications were not a way of gaining research contracts in Norway, and he did not renew my contract. I stayed for a time dependent on my wife’s salary. I understood then, that it was an important objective of the operation of the Polar Institute to gain research grants from the Ministry of Environment, whose raison d’être was based on finding proof of human pollution.Hier zien we uit de ervaring van Jaworowski dat onderzoekers dus al vanaf de jaren zeventig worden gedwongen om mee te lopen met de AGW hypothese daar men anders geen onderzoeksgeld meer hoeft te verwachten. Dus hebben we al dertig jaar te maken met een klimaatwetenschap die gekaapt is door de politiek.
Q: So, you are saying that any scientist who does not comply with the global warming ideology imposed on universities, will fall victim? Jaworowski: Yes. If politicians are funding the studies, on the one hand, scientists rejoice because science requires big money. But, on the other had, such research cannot freely flourish by listening to, and obeying political orders.Later I worked for some time at the Norwegian Institute of Energy. We decided to see if the research on CO2 in the ice of Greenland and Antarctica was conducted properly. Statoil. would like to finance these studies, despite the costs amounting to $2 million. Note, however that after the company had consulted with the government, probably with the Environment Ministry, these “consultants” decided that this project would be “immoral.” At the time, the Prime Minister of Norway was Mme. Gro Harlem Brundtland. She is now the UN special climate envoy. During the UN General Assembly session in May 2007, Brundtland declared that “it’s completely immoral, even to question the UN’s scientific consensus” (on man-made global warming). Climatic morality sounds like a Norwegian specialty.
Het was dus in immoreel om zuiver onderzoek te verrichten naar de IPCC consensus, waar kwamen we dergelijke uitspraken de laatste maanden ook al meer tegen? Dit is toch echt een argument dat past binnen een geloofsovertuiging, en staat lijnrecht tegenover wetenschap.
The Statoil representative said that, if his company had funded such research, that would be used against them by their competitors, and the company would be penalized much more than it costs to finance our research. Thus ended our project.The Club of Rome held that “Earth has cancer; the cancer is man.” Humanity as a whole has become a “fictitious enemy of the planet.” That favorite of the environmentalists, Jacques Y. Cousteau, said that to maintain balance on Earth, every year 123 million people should be “removed.” UN representatives want to reduce the number of people on Earth to 1 billion or less.
These inhuman ideas have its roots in Thomas Malthus, who in 1798 formulated the false theory that while populations of the world would increase, the food resources available to them would increase only arithmetically. Malthus interpreted overpopulation as an evil, but he failed to take into account the technological advances in agriculture and food production. His drastic recommendations from 212 years ago are still being used, and are the basis of the Malthusianism of the Club of Rome and the green ideology.
Lees hier meer over Malthus, de Club van Rome en John Holdren, een man met gevaarlijke ideen (sterilisatie via drinkwater, gedwongen abortus, wereldwijde VN militaire politie om burgers onder controle te houden) , jawel dit is dezelfde Holdren die nu adviseur van president Obama is.
I wish to add that after the outbreak of Climategate, in December 2009, the former chief economic advisor of President Putin, Dr. Andrei Illarionov, disclosed the mechanism of falsifying the global climate trends and constructing the infamous hockey curves of temperature. The Russians transferred to the CRU center at East Anglia University all the temperature data for the years 1860-2005, from their 476 meteorological stations. CRU selected the data from only 121 stations, in such a way that in the years 1965-2005, the CRU made the temperature higher, and in the years 1860-1960 lower than the real temperature. Thus they created a false increasing temperature trend of 0.67°C.Almost an exactly similar falsification of Australian temperature data by CRU and the NOAA/GHNC, was disclosed in December by Dr. W. Eschenbach. In this case, the temperature trend was “corrected” to be 2.5°C higher. This illustrates how credulous the public and politicians have been for decades. They were falsely made to believe that they were well informed, with 90% certainty and full scientific consensus! Climategate might become a catharsis, a bitter medicine, that will free science and the public from the gloomy climatic phantom, save the world from global economic disaster, and allow us to enjoy the golden gift of nature: our Modern Warm Period. Let it last long.
categorie: AGW, Uncategorized, klimatologie